Why Synthetic Data Will Transform AI Data Licensing
In this article
AI is revolutionizing industries at a staggering pace, yet a major hurdle remains: high-quality training data. While debates often focus on model architectures and computing power, the true linchpin of reliable AI systems is the human data used to train them. The reliance on human-generated content is leading us to what experts call a “data wall,” where existing methods simply won’t keep up with AI’s demands.
The current approach to AI training data acquisition often relies on web scraping and aggregating publicly available information or entering into data licensing partnerships with a select group of premium rights holders, whether that’s news media, stock photo libraries or music licensing companies.
However, both approaches have proven to be unsatisfactory for AI companies and rights holders. Scraping raises serious ethical and legal issues around copyright infringement and privacy violations, while traditional licensing deals can be slow and complex to negotiate. This fragmented landscape threatens to undermine trust between industries and AI developers.
But there’s a new way forward that is gaining traction: synthetic data partnerships. Synthetic data, carefully generated to mirror real-world information while preserving privacy, likeness and intellectual property rights, offers a promising solution. By forming strategic partnerships between AI companies and rights holders, we can create high-quality synthetic datasets that fuel AI innovation while respecting ownership rights and maintaining data integrity.
What’s remarkable is how synthetic data can dramatically accelerate AI development timelines. Traditional data licensing deals typically involve 3-12 months of negotiations, legal reviews and delivery coordination.
By contrast, synthetic data partnerships can compress these timelines from months to hours by establishing clear frameworks upfront and generating new data on demand. This speed advantage is crucial in today's fast-moving AI landscape, where being first to market with a reliable solution can mean the difference between success and obsolescence.
Consider the healthcare sector, where patient privacy is paramount. Instead of spending months negotiating access to sensitive medical records, synthetic data can replicate statistical patterns while completely anonymizing individual information.
Financial institutions can generate unlimited synthetic transaction data that maintains the complex patterns needed for fraud detection without exposing customer information. Media companies can create synthetic content that preserves creative elements while protecting copyrights.
These partnerships also create a more efficient market for data licensing. Rather than negotiating separate agreements for each use case, synthetic data partnerships can establish flexible frameworks that adapt to different applications. This creates a perpetual data flywheel: As new real-world data is created and fed into the system, synthetic data generators can learn from it in real time, producing fresh data that reflects current trends and patterns.
Modern AI systems are increasingly using AI models to create synthetic data by drawing from verified, licensed datasets — their “ground truth” corpus. This approach allows AI models to generate new content while maintaining accuracy by continually referencing and learning from authenticated source material.
The result is a dynamic system that can scale data generation while preserving the quality standards established by the original human-created content. It’s a transformative approach that benefits both AI developers, who get high-quality training data, and rights holders, who maintain control over how their content influences AI development.
Take a music rights holder partnering with an AI company to license synthetic training data. Instead of licensing their catalog piecemeal for different AI applications, they could establish a framework where the catalog serves as a verified “ground truth” dataset.
The AI company could then generate synthetic music data derived from the original works that captures key characteristics — tempo changes, chord progressions, instrumental arrangements — while preserving the original human-made works.
The key innovation lies in building a truly scalable data ecosystem that doesn’t compromise on quality. While traditional data licensing is inherently limited by the pace of human content creation, synthetic data systems can scale infinitely but still remain anchored to high-quality human-created content.
This creates a true perpetual data machine that can meet the endless appetite of AI systems and maintain fidelity to real-world patterns and standards. As AI models grow larger and more sophisticated, this ability to scale data generation without sacrificing quality becomes increasingly crucial.
Some critics argue synthetic data might not capture the full complexity of real-world information, with some even warning of “model collapse,” a phenomenon in which AI systems trained primarily on AI-generated content begin to produce increasingly degraded outputs. These concerns are valid when synthetic data is created through simple prompting of language models without proper curation.
However, this oversimplified approach misses the sophisticated reality of modern synthetic data pipelines. Success lies in careful dataset architecture: a combination of curated human-created content, rigorous quality controls and sophisticated generation techniques that go far beyond basic prompting.
With rights holders actively involved in the synthetic data generation process, we can ensure that crucial patterns and edge cases are properly represented while maintaining grounding in human-created content. Additionally, synthetic data pipelines can be rapidly iterated and refined based on model performance, creating a feedback loop that enhances data quality over time.
The key is not just generating more data but building sophisticated systems that maintain the crucial integrity of ground truth human input throughout the generation process.
The market for AI training data is evolving rapidly, and synthetic data partnerships offer a way to bring order to this emerging ecosystem. By establishing clear value chains and efficient exchange mechanisms, these partnerships can help mature the market while accelerating innovation. However, the industry cannot move forward effectively without regulatory clarity.
As we begin 2025, dataset providers, AI companies and rights holders are working together through industry groups to advocate for clear federal guidelines on AI training data rights and usage. This isn't just about avoiding legal issues. It's about building a sustainable framework for AI development that benefits all stakeholders.
The future of AI depends not just on technological advancement but on our ability to build ethical frameworks for data acquisition and usage. With a new administration taking office, we have a critical opportunity to establish clear federal policies around AI training data.
While industry self-regulation through data partnerships is an important start, it must be complemented by thoughtful policy frameworks that protect innovation while respecting intellectual property rights. The U.S. needs to lead in establishing these guardrails — not just for domestic innovation but to remain competitive in the global AI race.
Alex Bestall is the founder and CEO of Rightsify and Global Copyright Exchange (GCX), two companies at the forefront of the AI music revolution.
Variety VIP+ Unearths Generative AI Data & Insights From All Angles — Pick a Story
